Topics
- Awards and Recognition
- Annual Reports
- Barrier Aesthetics
- Blue Star Memorial Highways
- Classified Landscaped Freeways
- Community Identification
- Construction Contract Standards
- Context Sensitive Solutions
- Erosion Control Toolbox
- Estimating
- Gateway Monuments
- Highway Planting
- Manuals, Guidance, Policy and Procedures
- Publications
- Research
- Roadside Toolbox
- Safety Roadside Rest Area System
- Scenic Highways
- Transportation Art
- Visual Impact Assessment Outlines
- Visual Impact Assessment Online Training
- Water Conservation
- Webinars
Contractor Resources
Erosion Control Toolbox
Tools
To Combine Specifications
Planning & Design
Improve Soil Health
- Soils Testing
- Local Topsoil
- Imported Topsoil
- Roughen Soil Surface
- Stepped Slopes
- Contour Grading and Slope Rounding
- Decompact Soil
- Soil Nutrients
- Compost (Incorporate)
Improve Soil Health & Provide Cover
Short Term Cover
Long Term Cover
Steep Slope Techniques
- Stepped Slope
- Cellular Confinement
- RECP Flap
- RECP Flap with Brush Layering
- RECP Wrap
- Soil Filled RSP
- Wire Blanket
- Wire Mesh Confinement
Planting
- Plant Selection
- TransPlant Application
- Noxious and Invasive Species
- Drill Seed
- Dry Seed
- Willow Cuttings
- Native Grass Sod
- Liner
- Seedling
- Brush Layering
Stormwater Treatment
Sediment Control
References
Erosion Control Toolbox
Welcome to the Caltrans Erosion Control Toolbox, a one-stop reference for erosion control standards and guidance. The purpose of this site is to provide Caltrans Landscape Architects with a single location that provides access to the information necessary to design successful, effective and cost efficient erosion control treatments.
Erosion Control Technical Guide
The Caltrans Technical Guide to Erosion Control Treatment, first presented in the "Key Concepts" Erosion Control training is now available online. Click here to download a copy of the Erosion Control Technical Guide. Please note that the "BMP Data Sheets" formerly included in the Technical Guide are available by clicking on the underlined links below.
Erosion Control Treatment Overview
The table below provides a general overview of various erosion control Best Management Practices (BMPs) together with a very rough idea of cost. Select the erosion control treatment(s) most suited to meet your project deficiencies.
Click on the hyperlink at left to obtain more specific information regarding a BMP.
| IMPROVE SOIL HEALTH | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M A X. S L O P E ( H : V ) | B E N E F I T S | C O S T | ||||||||
| 4:1 |
3:1 |
2:1 |
1.5:1 |
1:1 |
Cut or Fill? | Soil Cover (1) | Soil Health (2) | Infil- tration (3) |
Cost/ Acre (4) |
|
| Roughen Soil | C/F | - | ||||||||
| Decompact Soil | C/F | - | ||||||||
| Stepped Slopes | N/A | C | - | |||||||
| Local Topsoil | C/F | - | ||||||||
| Imported Topsoil | C/F | - | ||||||||
| Compost (Incorporate) |
C/F | - | ||||||||
| PROVIDE SOIL COVER & IMPROVE SOIL HEALTH | ||||||||||
| M A X. S L O P E ( H : V ) | B E N E F I T S | C O S T | ||||||||
| 4:1 |
3:1 |
2:1 |
1.5:1 |
1:1 |
Cut or Fill? | Soil Cover (1) | Soil Health (2) | Infil- tration (3) |
Cost/ Acre (4) |
|
| Duff | C/F | $40,000 | ||||||||
| Mulch | C/F | $20,000 | ||||||||
| Compost Blanket | C/F | $15,000 | ||||||||
| PROVIDE SHORT TERM SOIL COVER | ||||||||||
| M A X. S L O P E ( H : V ) | B E N E F I T S | C O S T | ||||||||
| 4:1 |
3:1 |
2:1 |
1.5:1 |
1:1 |
Cut or Fill? | Soil Cover (1) | Soil Health (2) | Infil- tration (3) |
Cost/ Acre (4) |
|
| EC (Punched Straw) | F | $12,000 | ||||||||
| EC (Hydroseed) | C/F | $10,000 | ||||||||
| EC (Type BFM) | C/F | $15,000 | ||||||||
| RECP Jute Mesh | C/F | $12,000 | ||||||||
| PROVIDE LONG TERM SOIL COVER | ||||||||||
| M A X. S L O P E ( H : V ) | B E N E F I T S | C O S T | ||||||||
| 4:1 |
3:1 |
2:1 |
1.5:1 |
1:1 |
Cut or Fill? | Soil Cover (1) | Soil Health (2) | Infil- tration (3) |
Cost/ Acre (4) |
|
| RECP Netting (Type A) | C/F | $35,000 | ||||||||
| RECP Netting (Type B) | C/F | $35,000 | ||||||||
| RECP Netting (Type C) | C/F | $35,000 | ||||||||
| RECP Blanket (Type A) |
N/A | N/A | C/F | $25,000 | ||||||
| RECP Blanket (Type B) |
N/A | N/A | C/F | $25,000 | ||||||
| RECP Blanket (Type C) |
N/A | N/A | C/F | $25,000 | ||||||
| RECP TRM (Type A) | N/A | N/A | C/F | $30,000 | ||||||
| RECP TRM (Type B) | N/A | N/A | C/F | $37,000 | ||||||
| RECP TRM (Type C) | N/A | N/A | C/F | $45,000 | ||||||
| STEEP SLOPE TECHNIQUES | ||||||||||
| M A X. S L O P E ( H : V ) | B E N E F I T S | C O S T | ||||||||
| 4:1 |
3:1 |
2:1 |
1.5:1 |
1:1 |
Cut or Fill? | Soil Cover (1) | Soil Health (2) | Infil- tration (3) |
Cost/ Acre (4) |
|
| Stepped Slopes | N/A | C | - | |||||||
| Brush Layering | N/A | F | - | |||||||
| RECP Flap | N/A | N/A | F | $50,000 | ||||||
| RECP Wrap | N/A | N/A | F | $60,000 | ||||||
| Soil Filled RSP | N/A | N/A | C | - | ||||||
| Cellular Confinement | N/A | N/A | C | $45,000 | ||||||
| Wire Blanket | N/A | N/A | N/A | C | $100,000 | |||||
| Wire Mesh Confinement | N/A | N/A | N/A | F | - | |||||
Legend (Maximum Slope) |
||||||||||
| Recommended | ||||||||||
| May or may not be recommended based on site conditions. | ||||||||||
| Generally Not Recommended | ||||||||||
| N/A | Not Applicable - this treatment is typically not used in these conditions. | |||||||||
Legend (Benefits) |
||||||||||
| Great Benefit | ||||||||||
| Moderate Benefit | ||||||||||
| Minimal Benefit | ||||||||||
| (1) | Treatments rated highly beneficial for soil cover include those that provide protection from raindrop impact and splash erosion. Treatments that provide good cover include loose mulches such as bark and compost, fiber included as part of hydroseeding, and rolled erosion control nets and blankets. | |||||||||
| (2) | Treatments rated highly beneficial for soil health include those that improve soil texture, soil structure, fertility, and soil microbiology. Treatments that notably improve soil health include compost incorporate, duff, and reusing local topsoil. | |||||||||
| (3) | Treatments rated highly beneficial for infiltration include those that slow runoff, improve soil structure and open up the soil texture to encourage infiltration of stormwater rather than encouraging runoff. Treatments that notably improve infiltration include compost incorporate, roughen soil and reusing local topsoil. | |||||||||
Legend (Cost Information) |
||||||||||
| - | Construction cost information not available. | |||||||||
| (4) | Very rough estimate of construction cost per acre. Construction cost varies greatly due to size of area treated, accessability, slope steepness, geographic location and economic health. For greater detail, click on the estimate number in the right-hand column. | |||||||||
What is the Goal?
When selecting and combining various erosion control treatments, it is important, foremost, to clearly identify "success". While the specific definition of "success" will vary depending upon specific site conditions, in general, a successful erosion control treatment will address three specific areas - soils, water, and vegetation.
The goal of effective erosion control is twofold:
- Maintain water quality - keep soils in place.
- Increase Infiltration - reduce runoff.
The Natural Environment As "Success"
In the natural environment, these goals are fulfilled by vegetation, mulch/duff, and porous soils. Vegetation and the mulch/duff layer protect the soil from raindrop impact and surface erosion. Healthy, porous soils infiltrate water reducing runoff, and provide the water necessary to sustain healthy vegetation. The mulch/duff layer protects the soil surface from erosion, provides nutrients to sustain vegetation, and feeds soil microorganisms that contribute to a well draining soil structure.
The Post-Project Environment
In the post-project environment, maintaining water quality and site hydrology is challenging because the natural vegetative cover and corresponding mulch/duff layer have been removed. Compaction by equipment together with the removal of organic material leads to very low infiltration rates. Unless addressed, these conditions lead to runoff, erosion, transport of sediment, and high runoff velocities and volumes.
The Way to the Goal
The key to getting the post-project site to function (from a stormwater runoff standpoint) similar to the natural, undisturbed site is to restore the functionality that has been removed. In general, the "successful" erosion control solution addresses:
- Soil Cover
- Healthy Soil
- Sustainable Vegetation
Soil Cover
Bare soil requires the protective cover provided by a mulch product (bark mulch, compost blanket, pine needles, straw, duff) or hydroseeding. These products protect the soil surface from erosion due to raindrop impact and sheet flow.
Healthy Soil
Healthy soils maintain stormwater quality and control erosion by their open structure that facilitates infiltration of runoff, and by providing the nutrients and soil biota necessary to support long-term sustainable vegetative cover. To maintain stormwater quality, disturbed roadsides that feature highly compacted sterile soils typically require decompaction and/or incorporation of organics such as compost to restore soil health.
Sustainable Vegetation
Sustainable vegetation is dependent upon selecting the proper mixture of plant types (grass, annual, perennial, forb, cutting, sod, liner, woody shrub) and species for specific site environmental conditions (geographic location, elevation, exposure, soil type). The short-term goal is to quickly establish vegetative cover to provide protection from raindrop impact and sheet-flow erosive forces. The long-term goal is to establish healthy mature vegetation that requires minimal replanting, supplemental water, or maintenance.
An erosion control solution that ensures a well drained soil including organic material and healthy soil biota, a surface mulch layer of duff/mulch, together with regionally appropriate plant material mimics the functionality of the natural environment, and with time should perform in a similar manner - protecting water quality and managing the runoff rate and volume.











